Analysis Featured

Peer-to-Peer Loans: Can Economically Intuitive Factors Improve Ability of Proprietary Algorithms to Predict Defaults?

LendingClub unemployment default rates

As compared to traditional lenders, peer-to-peer platforms (P2P) are supposed to use sophisticated data-intensive proprietary algorithms to assess a borrower’s credit risk. Since an increasing number of loans are now being underwritten by these algorithms, either directly through the platform or via partnerships with traditional banks, investors and regulators now need to understand how the algorithms work in practice. In this post, we evaluate one aspect of the performance of these algorithms, namely, whether they make adequate use of predictors that economic theory suggests are drivers of credit risk. Specifically, we focus on unemployment rates in the area where the borrower resides. Using peer-to-peer consumer loans offered by LendingClub, we find that local unemployment rates can significantly improve the predictive power of their algorithm.

Our analysis is based on 600,000+ 36-month maturity loans originated between 2011 and 2015. The number and dollar amounts of loans issued over this period is shown in Figures 1 and 2.

LendingClub number of loans
Total number of loans issued between 2011 and 2015.
LendingClub dollar amount of loans
Total dollar value of loans originated between 2011 and 2015.

To examine whether unemployment can boost LendingClub’s algorithm, we compare the default rates of loans that have similar default risk according to LendingClub but were issued in areas with different unemployment rates. For each year of loan origination, we first categorize a loan according to LendingClub’s assessment of its credit risk. Specifically, we categorize a loan as “low risk”, “moderate risk,” or “high risk” based on its interest rate — which is set by LendingClub’s algorithm. Then, we categorize a loan as being in a low, moderate, or high unemployment area based on the unemployment rate in the zip-code where the borrower resides. Finally, we measure the unemployment rate effect as the difference in default rates for loans in the same risk category but different unemployment rate category.

The default rates for loans in different risk-unemployment categories is shown in Figure 3.

LendingClub unemployment default rates
The average percentage of loan defaults in low and high-unemployment areas by three risk categories. Shadowed bars show default rate in low-unemployment areas and solid bars present default rates in high-unemployment area.

This figure plots the average default rates for each risk-unemployment category, averaged across the years of origination. Loans issued to borrowers who live in areas with high unemployment rates default at markedly higher rates. For example, for high-risk loans, the default rate in high unemployment areas is about two percentage points higher in that of low unemployment areas. Furthermore, loans in high unemployment areas default at a higher rate across all years. In Figure 4, we plot the differential in default rates for the high-risk loans for each year of origination.

LendingClub loan default rates
The difference in loan default rate between high and low-unemployment areas for high risk loans.

As seen, the differential is positive across all years in the sample and is about 1.5% even for the most recent years.
Returns on the loans in the high-unemployment category have also been noticeably lower. In Figure 5, we compare annualized rates of return across loans from the different risk-unemployment categories. For example, for the high-risk loans, the returns differential is 60 basis points.

LendingClub annualized returns
Annualized returns for loans. Shadowed bars show returns in loans originated in low-unemployment areas and solid bars show returns in loans originated in high-unemployment areas

Using a Cox proportional hazard model, an industry-standard framework for analyzing default risk, we confirmed that the unemployment effect described here is statistically significant.

Our analysis on drivers of credit risk for P2P loans is ongoing, and we will update you with our new findings in future posts.

Authors:

Written by Atay Kizilaslan and Aziz Lookman.

About the author

Allen Taylor

Add Comment

Click here to post a comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Testimonials

default image

"Your daily letter is great!" , Ram , Founder and CEO, PeerIQ

default image

"Hi George - just want to tell you that you are doing a great work with Lending Times;-) Brgds, Kasper" , Kasper, Partner and Co-founder at Dansk Faktura Børs A/S

default image

"I've been following your newsletter for some time now and have been very impressed with the content." Charlie,Co-Founder | Bolstr

default image

"Hey George, I must say I really enjoy your site. It has inspired me to do some changes at our platform and we are the biggest consumer lender in Sweden." , Ludwig, CEO @ Savelend Sweden AB

default image

"Your daily email is very useful. It gives quick update on what's going in the market. Thank you very much for all that info." Yann Murciano, Head of Base Metals Trading at Morgan Stanley

Our daily p2p news digest